PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.69%
Revenue growth below 50% of 8095.HK's 29.81%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
14.52%
Cost growth less than half of 8095.HK's 56.29%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
6.31%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x 8095.HK's 1.97%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-5.67%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.95%
G&A reduction while 8095.HK shows 34.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.24%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-12.52%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
9.97%
Total costs growth less than half of 8095.HK's 27.07%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-74.19%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-94.06%
D&A reduction while 8095.HK shows 1277.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
43.74%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x 8095.HK's 22.57%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
27.55%
EBITDA margin growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.79%
Operating income growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
35.58%
Operating margin growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-96.28%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
44.78%
Pre-tax income growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.47%
Pre-tax margin growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.22%
Similar tax expense growth to 8095.HK's 10.58%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
52.89%
Net income growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
35.67%
Net margin growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.29%
EPS growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.33%
Share count reduction below 50% of 8095.HK's 16.37%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
33.33%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of 8095.HK's 16.37%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.