PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.20%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-19.17%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-19.30%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.13%
Margin decline while 8095.HK shows 19.73% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.18%
G&A growth while 8095.HK reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-105.88%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
68.76%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 8095.HK's 222.52%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-7.40%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-12.50%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3000.00%
D&A growth while 8095.HK reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-131.82%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-139.38%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-142.56%
Operating income decline while 8095.HK shows 0.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-152.67%
Operating margin decline while 8095.HK shows 89.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1800.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x 8095.HK's 85.60%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-139.91%
Pre-tax income decline while 8095.HK shows 56.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-149.39%
Pre-tax margin decline while 8095.HK shows 196.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-36.83%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-158.05%
Net income decline while 8095.HK shows 1276.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-171.84%
Net margin decline while 8095.HK shows 2328.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-177.78%
EPS decline while 8095.HK shows 1433.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-177.78%
Diluted EPS decline while 8095.HK shows 1433.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.00%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-25.00%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.