PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.13%
Revenue growth below 50% of 8095.HK's 76.95%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
25.12%
Cost growth less than half of 8095.HK's 70.57%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-32.23%
Gross profit decline while 8095.HK shows 84.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-40.09%
Margin decline while 8095.HK shows 4.26% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.76%
G&A reduction while 8095.HK shows 3.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5000.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-27.76%
Operating expenses reduction while 8095.HK shows 11.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.22%
Total costs growth less than half of 8095.HK's 54.73%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
214.29%
Interest expense growth while 8095.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-112.66%
D&A reduction while 8095.HK shows 160.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-15.51%
EBITDA decline while 8095.HK shows 263.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.10%
EBITDA margin decline while 8095.HK shows 105.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.47%
Operating income growth below 50% of 8095.HK's 225.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.21%
Operating margin growth below 50% of 8095.HK's 83.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-154.89%
Other expenses reduction while 8095.HK shows 2753.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.16%
Pre-tax income decline while 8095.HK shows 238.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.69%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of 8095.HK's 91.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
100.41%
Similar tax expense growth to 8095.HK's 99.55%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
-20.98%
Net income decline while 8095.HK shows 342.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.94%
Net margin decline while 8095.HK shows 149.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.43%
EPS decline while 8095.HK shows 358.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.43%
Diluted EPS decline while 8095.HK shows 358.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.49%
Share count reduction while 8095.HK shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.49%
Diluted share reduction while 8095.HK shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.