PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.32%
Revenue growth below 50% of 8095.HK's 34.23%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-11.73%
Cost reduction while 8095.HK shows 33.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
140.37%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x 8095.HK's 34.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
123.98%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x 8095.HK's 0.57%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.67%
G&A growth above 1.5x 8095.HK's 2.53%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-190.20%
Other expenses reduction while 8095.HK shows 195.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
33.65%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x 8095.HK's 15.15%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-4.61%
Total costs reduction while 8095.HK shows 29.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-40.91%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-190.20%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
328.29%
EBITDA growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
312.73%
EBITDA margin growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
320.99%
Operating income growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
305.92%
Operating margin growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-120.55%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
305.48%
Pre-tax income growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
291.47%
Pre-tax margin growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.21%
Tax expense growth while 8095.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
205.65%
Net income growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
198.45%
Net margin growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
179.41%
EPS growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
179.41%
Diluted EPS growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.99%
Share count reduction below 50% of 8095.HK's 7.29%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
33.99%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of 8095.HK's 7.29%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.