PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.31%
Positive growth while 8095.HK shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
13.78%
Cost increase while 8095.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
4.98%
Positive growth while 8095.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-5.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.78%
Similar G&A growth to 8095.HK's 50.25%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.65%
Other expenses growth while 8095.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
41.80%
Operating expenses growth while 8095.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.94%
Total costs growth while 8095.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.89%
D&A reduction while 8095.HK shows 2525.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-91.39%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-92.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-86.10%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-87.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-61.49%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-91.67%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-92.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.31%
Tax expense reduction while 8095.HK shows 114.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-119.99%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-117.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-120.37%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-120.37%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.50%
Share count reduction while 8095.HK shows 8.46% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.