PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
40.79%
Revenue growth below 50% of 8095.HK's 90.90%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
46.31%
Cost growth 50-75% of 8095.HK's 89.94%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
18.55%
Gross profit growth below 50% of 8095.HK's 91.99%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-15.80%
Margin decline while 8095.HK shows 0.57% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.75%
G&A growth 1.25-1.5x 8095.HK's 22.15%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize overhead control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
284.34%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x 8095.HK's 155.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
27.76%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of 8095.HK's 50.27%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
43.00%
Total costs growth 50-75% of 8095.HK's 76.72%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
2130.00%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x 8095.HK's 49.74%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
284.34%
D&A growth while 8095.HK reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-27.49%
EBITDA decline while 8095.HK shows 93.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.50%
EBITDA margin decline while 8095.HK shows 1.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-46.41%
Operating income decline while 8095.HK shows 145.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-61.93%
Operating margin decline while 8095.HK shows 28.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
27.96%
Other expenses growth while 8095.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-48.36%
Pre-tax income decline while 8095.HK shows 95.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-63.32%
Pre-tax margin decline while 8095.HK shows 2.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-88.15%
Tax expense reduction while 8095.HK shows 127.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.44%
Net income growth below 50% of 8095.HK's 42.20%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-24.40%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
14.29%
EPS growth below 50% of 8095.HK's 38.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of 8095.HK's 38.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.54%
Share count reduction while 8095.HK shows 2.89% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.