PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.30%
Revenue decline while 8095.HK shows 188.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
0.55%
Cost growth less than half of 8095.HK's 443.44%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-16.70%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.27%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-73.19%
Other expenses reduction while 8095.HK shows 113.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-25.12%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.13%
Total costs reduction while 8095.HK shows 225.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-37.87%
Interest expense reduction while 8095.HK shows 34.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-98.05%
D&A reduction while 8095.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-145.58%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-148.81%
EBITDA margin decline while 8095.HK shows 29.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
46.48%
Operating income growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
45.78%
Operating margin growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-145.42%
Other expenses reduction while 8095.HK shows 89.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.85%
Pre-tax income decline while 8095.HK shows 69.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.18%
Pre-tax margin decline while 8095.HK shows 89.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
99.55%
Tax expense growth while 8095.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-24.90%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.39%
EPS decline while 8095.HK shows 84.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.39%
Diluted EPS decline while 8095.HK shows 84.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.