PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.65%
Positive growth while 8095.HK shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.42%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
19.79%
Positive growth while 8095.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
17.84%
Margin expansion while 8095.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.51%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
431.35%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x 8095.HK's 108.12%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-18.24%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.00%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
24.43%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x 8095.HK's 10.36%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
2157.36%
D&A growth while 8095.HK reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
25.53%
EBITDA growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.49%
EBITDA margin growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
81.17%
Operating income growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
78.23%
Operating margin growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-782.87%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
25.72%
Pre-tax income growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.68%
Pre-tax margin growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1661.11%
Tax expense growth while 8095.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.97%
Net income growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.12%
Net margin growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.91%
EPS growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.91%
Diluted EPS growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.