PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.94%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-5.78%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-18.47%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.83%
G&A growth less than half of 8095.HK's 1130.85%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.67%
Other expenses reduction while 8095.HK shows 2201.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
24.91%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 8095.HK's 679.72%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-3.34%
Total costs reduction while 8095.HK shows 6.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-21.35%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-94.54%
D&A reduction while 8095.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-30.78%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.06%
Operating income decline while 8095.HK shows 777.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-45.75%
Operating margin decline while 8095.HK shows 908.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
68.12%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of 8095.HK's 112.42%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-32.43%
Pre-tax income decline while 8095.HK shows 115.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.60%
Pre-tax margin decline while 8095.HK shows 118.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.62%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-30.56%
Net income decline while 8095.HK shows 113.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.57%
Net margin decline while 8095.HK shows 116.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.53%
EPS decline while 8095.HK shows 113.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.53%
Diluted EPS decline while 8095.HK shows 113.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.02%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x 8095.HK's 0.22%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.