PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.23%
Revenue growth below 50% of 8095.HK's 18.15%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.95%
Cost growth less than half of 8095.HK's 28.65%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
11.20%
Positive growth while 8095.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.69%
Margin expansion while 8095.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.53%
G&A reduction while 8095.HK shows 6.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-101.02%
Other expenses reduction while 8095.HK shows 6.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-8.45%
Operating expenses reduction while 8095.HK shows 12.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.43%
Total costs growth less than half of 8095.HK's 26.17%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-8.12%
Interest expense reduction while 8095.HK shows 0.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-95.01%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-24.59%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
111.26%
Operating income growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
102.69%
Operating margin growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-111.83%
Other expenses reduction while 8095.HK shows 10.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-27.30%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.99%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-29.80%
Net income decline while 8095.HK shows 4.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.84%
EPS decline while 8095.HK shows 4.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.27%
Diluted EPS decline while 8095.HK shows 4.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.16%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.