PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-20.05%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-24.89%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
34.37%
Positive growth while 8095.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
68.07%
Margin expansion while 8095.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.26%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
150.00%
Other expenses growth while 8095.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
45.25%
Operating expenses growth while 8095.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-21.03%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-5.18%
Interest expense reduction while 8095.HK shows 5.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-92.19%
D&A reduction while 8095.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
4.28%
EBITDA growth below 50% of 8095.HK's 89.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.44%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of 8095.HK's 87.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
456.26%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x 8095.HK's 85.75%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
545.61%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x 8095.HK's 82.57%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
89.76%
Other expenses growth while 8095.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
405.58%
Pre-tax income growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
482.21%
Pre-tax margin growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
179.23%
Tax expense growth while 8095.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
712.98%
Net income growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
866.71%
Net margin growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
725.00%
EPS growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
725.00%
Diluted EPS growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.