PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.94%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-3.35%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-22.22%
Gross profit decline while 8095.HK shows 102.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-17.31%
Margin decline while 8095.HK shows 263.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.90%
G&A growth 1.25-1.5x 8095.HK's 20.88%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize overhead control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2746.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
15.00%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of 8095.HK's 22.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-1.50%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
9.50%
Interest expense growth less than half of 8095.HK's 29.43%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
1888.42%
D&A growth above 1.5x 8095.HK's 81.63%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-104.60%
EBITDA decline while 8095.HK shows 60.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-104.89%
EBITDA margin decline while 8095.HK shows 29.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-125.78%
Operating income decline while 8095.HK shows 3.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-127.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
54.84%
Other expenses growth less than half of 8095.HK's 225.52%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-133.08%
Pre-tax income decline while 8095.HK shows 336.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-135.17%
Pre-tax margin decline while 8095.HK shows 683.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-118.45%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-132.18%
Net income decline while 8095.HK shows 361.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-134.21%
Net margin decline while 8095.HK shows 728.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-132.00%
EPS decline while 8095.HK shows 363.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-132.00%
Diluted EPS decline while 8095.HK shows 363.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.55%
Share count reduction while 8095.HK shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.