PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.85%
Revenue decline while 8095.HK shows 312.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-13.84%
Cost reduction while 8095.HK shows 307.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
38.95%
Gross profit growth below 50% of 8095.HK's 330.99%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
50.80%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x 8095.HK's 4.48%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.66%
G&A reduction while 8095.HK shows 52.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.66%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of 8095.HK's 32.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-6.94%
Operating expenses reduction while 8095.HK shows 55.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.03%
Total costs reduction while 8095.HK shows 209.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
24.79%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x 8095.HK's 5.87%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-94.97%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
2673.36%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x 8095.HK's 918.55%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2892.71%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x 8095.HK's 298.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
606.39%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x 8095.HK's 272.08%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
649.56%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x 8095.HK's 141.71%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-99.32%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
444.01%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x 8095.HK's 10.87%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
473.33%
Pre-tax margin growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1204.51%
Tax expense growth less than half of 8095.HK's 3535.82%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
339.13%
Net income growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
359.51%
Net margin growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
341.67%
EPS growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
341.67%
Diluted EPS growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.57%
Share count increase while 8095.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.