PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
230.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.37 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.15%
Positive growth while 8095.HK shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
16.55%
Cost increase while 8095.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
2.52%
Positive growth while 8095.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-10.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.04%
G&A growth while 8095.HK reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
162.38%
Other expenses growth while 8095.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
74.70%
Operating expenses growth while 8095.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
23.89%
Total costs growth while 8095.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-24.17%
Interest expense reduction while 8095.HK shows 9.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2221.33%
D&A growth above 1.5x 8095.HK's 92.73%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-103.63%
EBITDA decline while 8095.HK shows 90.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-103.18%
EBITDA margin decline while 8095.HK shows 254.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-169.74%
Operating income decline while 8095.HK shows 1536.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-161.10%
Operating margin decline while 8095.HK shows 2953.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
619.11%
Other expenses growth 1.25-1.5x 8095.HK's 436.02%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize cost items.
-127.45%
Pre-tax income decline while 8095.HK shows 236.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-124.05%
Pre-tax margin decline while 8095.HK shows 528.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-118.65%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-135.19%
Net income decline while 8095.HK shows 307.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-130.83%
Net margin decline while 8095.HK shows 660.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-134.48%
EPS decline while 8095.HK shows 310.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-134.48%
Diluted EPS decline while 8095.HK shows 310.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.