PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-15.37%
Revenue decline while 8095.HK shows 37.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-14.85%
Cost reduction while 8095.HK shows 47.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-20.11%
Gross profit decline while 8095.HK shows 4.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.60%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.54%
G&A reduction while 8095.HK shows 2.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15185.71%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-24.52%
Operating expenses reduction while 8095.HK shows 19.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.28%
Total costs reduction while 8095.HK shows 43.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-42.53%
Interest expense reduction while 8095.HK shows 5.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1719.92%
D&A growth above 1.5x 8095.HK's 87.60%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-28.33%
EBITDA decline while 8095.HK shows 3877.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.63%
EBITDA margin decline while 8095.HK shows 2793.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.83%
Operating income decline while 8095.HK shows 5589.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-53.40%
Operating margin decline while 8095.HK shows 4038.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.43%
Other expenses growth less than half of 8095.HK's 338.89%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
4.34%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of 8095.HK's 2458.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-13.03%
Pre-tax margin decline while 8095.HK shows 1760.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
87.59%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x 8095.HK's 36.91%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
7.11%
Net income growth below 50% of 8095.HK's 3271.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.76%
Net margin decline while 8095.HK shows 2352.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.33%
EPS growth below 50% of 8095.HK's 3233.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.33%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of 8095.HK's 3233.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.