0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.33%
Similar revenue growth to 8095.HK's 7.80%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
4.74%
Cost increase while 8095.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
21.86%
Gross profit growth below 50% of 8095.HK's 46.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.61%
Margin expansion below 50% of 8095.HK's 36.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.92%
G&A growth above 1.5x 8095.HK's 2.10%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.17%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x 8095.HK's 40.15%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
13.68%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x 8095.HK's 8.79%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
5.93%
Total costs growth above 1.5x 8095.HK's 0.54%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
2.53%
Interest expense growth while 8095.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-94.51%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
34.27%
EBITDA growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.18%
EBITDA margin growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.95%
Operating income growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.42%
Operating margin growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.31%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.53%
Pre-tax income growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.15%
Pre-tax margin growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-68.48%
Tax expense reduction while 8095.HK shows 11.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.68%
Net income growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.41%
Net margin growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.05%
EPS growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.05%
Diluted EPS growth while 8095.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.