0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.32%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x General Transportation median of 1.61%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
-11.73%
Cost reduction while General Transportation median is 2.13%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
140.37%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x General Transportation median of 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
123.98%
Margin expansion while General Transportation median declines. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.67%
G&A change of 33.67% versus flat General Transportation overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-190.20%
Other expenses reduction while General Transportation median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
33.65%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x General Transportation median of 6.30%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-4.61%
Total costs reduction while General Transportation median is 2.94%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-40.91%
Interest expense reduction while General Transportation median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-190.20%
D&A reduction while General Transportation median is 0.31%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
328.29%
EBITDA growth while General Transportation declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
312.73%
EBITDA margin growth while General Transportation declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
320.99%
Operating income growth while General Transportation declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
305.92%
Operating margin growth while General Transportation declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-120.55%
Other expenses reduction while General Transportation median is -10.07%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
305.48%
Pre-tax income growth while General Transportation declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
291.47%
Pre-tax margin growth while General Transportation declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
9.21%
Tax expense change of 9.21% versus flat General Transportation. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
205.65%
Net income growth while General Transportation declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
198.45%
Net margin growth while General Transportation declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
179.41%
EPS growth while General Transportation declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
179.41%
Diluted EPS growth while General Transportation declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
33.99%
Share count increase while General Transportation reduces shares. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
33.99%
Diluted share increase while General Transportation reduces shares. Peter Lynch would examine differences.