0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.49%
Revenue decline while General Transportation median is -6.10%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-5.36%
Cost reduction while General Transportation median is -9.64%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
15.26%
Positive growth while General Transportation median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
19.43%
Margin expansion while General Transportation median declines. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.31%
G&A reduction while General Transportation median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.37%
Other expenses change of 15.37% versus flat General Transportation costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
-12.31%
Operating expenses reduction while General Transportation median is -12.64%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-6.13%
Total costs reduction while General Transportation median is -8.03%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-2.74%
Interest expense reduction while General Transportation median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
2203.46%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x General Transportation median of 0.32%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
168.75%
EBITDA growth while General Transportation declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
171.24%
Margin change of 171.24% versus flat General Transportation. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
121.26%
Operating income growth while General Transportation declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
122.03%
Operating margin growth while General Transportation declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
187.05%
Other expenses growth while General Transportation reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
88.06%
Pre-tax income growth while General Transportation declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
87.63%
Pre-tax margin growth while General Transportation declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
1833.33%
Tax expense change of 1833.33% versus flat General Transportation. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
85.32%
Net income growth while General Transportation declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
84.79%
Net margin growth while General Transportation declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
84.31%
EPS growth while General Transportation declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
84.31%
Diluted EPS change of 84.31% versus flat General Transportation. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.