0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-0.99%
Negative ROE while 8095.HK stands at 1.05%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-0.21%
Negative ROA while 8095.HK stands at 0.78%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-1.43%
Both companies show negative ROCE. Martin Whitman would investigate if external factors hamper profitability.
8.16%
Gross margin below 50% of 8095.HK's 16.58%. Michael Burry would watch for cost or pricing crises.
-0.83%
Both companies are negative at the operating level. Martin Whitman would see if the entire niche faces fundamental challenges.
-0.43%
Negative net margin while 8095.HK has 50.21%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.