PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-1.54%
Negative ROE while 8095.HK stands at 5.92%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-0.35%
Negative ROA while 8095.HK stands at 4.20%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-4.60%
Negative ROCE while 8095.HK is at 3.91%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
15.37%
Positive margin while 8095.HK is negative. John Neff would see if this confers a decisive advantage.
-3.39%
Negative operating margin while 8095.HK has 234.84%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-0.91%
Negative net margin while 8095.HK has 315.00%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.