PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.95%
Positive revenue growth while 8402.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
9.74%
Positive gross profit growth while 8402.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
28.23%
EBIT growth below 50% of 8402.HK's 106.08%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
129.01%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x 8402.HK's 113.35%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
19.66%
Net income growth under 50% of 8402.HK's 101.61%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-10.36%
Negative EPS growth while 8402.HK is at 101.92%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-10.36%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 8402.HK is at 101.92%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
33.33%
Share change of 33.33% while 8402.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
33.33%
Diluted share change of 33.33% while 8402.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative OCF growth while 8402.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-100.00%
Negative FCF growth while 8402.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.74%
We cut SG&A while 8402.HK invests at 55.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.