PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.01%
Positive revenue growth while 8402.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
92.78%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 8402.HK's 7.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
89.02%
Positive EBIT growth while 8402.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
91.50%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 8402.HK's 33.39%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
83.06%
Net income growth above 1.5x 8402.HK's 2.22%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
82.88%
EPS growth above 1.5x 8402.HK's 3.85%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
82.88%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 8402.HK's 3.85%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.00%
Share change of 0.00% while 8402.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative OCF growth while 8402.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-100.00%
Negative FCF growth while 8402.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.17%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8402.HK stands at 83.67%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-116.21%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8402.HK is 3100.75%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.85%
We cut SG&A while 8402.HK invests at 45.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.