PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.69%
Positive revenue growth while 8402.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
60.56%
Positive gross profit growth while 8402.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
113.41%
Positive EBIT growth while 8402.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
113.93%
Positive operating income growth while 8402.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
107.76%
Positive net income growth while 8402.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
110.13%
Positive EPS growth while 8402.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
110.13%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 8402.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 8402.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.40%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 8402.HK stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.04%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8402.HK is 52.39%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.30%
Equity/share CAGR of 46.30% while 8402.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.41%
We cut SG&A while 8402.HK invests at 5.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.