PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.46%
Revenue growth under 50% of 8402.HK's 42.22%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-21.93%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-70.78%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-280.20%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
72.25%
Positive net income growth while 8402.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
71.74%
Positive EPS growth while 8402.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
71.74%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 8402.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 8402.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.89%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.44%
Positive short-term CAGR while 8402.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.26%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 8402.HK is at 44.78%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.69%
We cut SG&A while 8402.HK invests at 110.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.