PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.32%
Revenue growth under 50% of 8402.HK's 85.29%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
59.74%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 8402.HK's 135.17%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-61.87%
Negative EBIT growth while 8402.HK is at 62.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-157.48%
Negative operating income growth while 8402.HK is at 60.37%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-784.05%
Negative net income growth while 8402.HK stands at 39.10%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-769.23%
Negative EPS growth while 8402.HK is at 40.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-769.23%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 8402.HK is at 40.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.00%
Share change of 0.00% while 8402.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.29%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8402.HK stands at 17.49%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-182.69%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.26%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 8402.HK is at 44.78%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while 8402.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-100.00%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-100.00%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-100.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.79%
We expand SG&A while 8402.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.