PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.56%
Positive revenue growth while 8402.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
84.46%
Positive gross profit growth while 8402.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
3.22%
Positive EBIT growth while 8402.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
8.20%
Positive operating income growth while 8402.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-2.44%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-3.16%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-1.27%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.64%
Share reduction while 8402.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.97%
Diluted share change of 0.97% while 8402.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.99%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-19.87%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.83%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 8402.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-89.81%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 8402.HK stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-178.48%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-122.53%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.13%
Equity/share CAGR of 9.13% while 8402.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
-27.61%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.81%
We cut SG&A while 8402.HK invests at 9.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.