PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.58%
Negative revenue growth while 8402.HK stands at 317.26%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-99.48%
Negative gross profit growth while 8402.HK is at 91.07%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-9.22%
Negative EBIT growth while 8402.HK is at 65.48%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-9.70%
Negative operating income growth while 8402.HK is at 64.61%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-8.69%
Negative net income growth while 8402.HK stands at 65.50%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-6.13%
Negative EPS growth while 8402.HK is at 66.13%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-8.12%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 8402.HK is at 66.13%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
2.40%
Share change of 2.40% while 8402.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.77%
Diluted share change of 0.77% while 8402.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative OCF growth while 8402.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-100.00%
Negative FCF growth while 8402.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.12%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-29.92%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-192.82%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-1294.42%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
100.00%
We show growth while 8402.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-100.00%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-100.00%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-100.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.35%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.