PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
46.55%
Positive revenue growth while 8402.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
79.37%
Positive gross profit growth while 8402.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-8363.40%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-3947.41%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-6318.68%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-5733.33%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-5733.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
1.22%
Share count expansion well above 8402.HK's 0.07%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.21%
Diluted share count expanding well above 8402.HK's 0.00%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.06%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-72.63%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8402.HK stands at 11.36%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 8402.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-982.76%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-1271.72%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8402.HK is 69.97%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-84.66%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-83.28%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
725.28%
SG&A growth well above 8402.HK's 14.77%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.