PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-13.23%
Negative revenue growth while 8402.HK stands at 35.41%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-57.09%
Negative gross profit growth while 8402.HK is at 399.08%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
87.32%
EBIT growth similar to 8402.HK's 96.14%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
85.80%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of 8402.HK's 98.76%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
88.51%
Net income growth at 50-75% of 8402.HK's 133.30%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
88.57%
EPS growth at 50-75% of 8402.HK's 137.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
88.57%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of 8402.HK's 137.50%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
-1.15%
Share reduction while 8402.HK is at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.20%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-78.36%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-76.97%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-111.16%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 8402.HK is at 27.96%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.08%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 8402.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
81.96%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of 8402.HK's 116.42%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-85.14%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-83.80%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.63%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. 8402.HK's 64.43%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-51.21%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-3.50%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-3.12%
We have a declining book value while 8402.HK shows 1.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-84.90%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-81.05%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.