PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.95%
Revenue growth under 50% of 8420.HK's 181.29%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
9.74%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 8420.HK's 108.44%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
28.23%
EBIT growth below 50% of 8420.HK's 125.30%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
129.01%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 8420.HK's 32.37%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
19.66%
Net income growth under 50% of 8420.HK's 127.72%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-10.36%
Negative EPS growth while 8420.HK is at 124.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-10.36%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 8420.HK is at 124.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
33.33%
Share count expansion well above 8420.HK's 26.39%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
33.33%
Diluted share count expanding well above 8420.HK's 26.39%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative OCF growth while 8420.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-100.00%
Negative FCF growth while 8420.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.74%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.