PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.01%
Revenue growth under 50% of 8420.HK's 248.95%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
92.78%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 8420.HK's 220.50%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
89.02%
EBIT growth 50-75% of 8420.HK's 169.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
91.50%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of 8420.HK's 169.97%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
83.06%
Net income growth under 50% of 8420.HK's 184.89%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
82.88%
EPS growth under 50% of 8420.HK's 166.67%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
82.88%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 8420.HK's 166.67%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.00%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 8420.HK's 2.61%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-100.00%
Negative FCF growth while 8420.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.17%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8420.HK stands at 505.56%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-116.21%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8420.HK is 207.55%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.85%
We cut SG&A while 8420.HK invests at 99.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.