PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.66%
Negative revenue growth while 8420.HK stands at 23.40%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-46.73%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-38.00%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-109.77%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-60.53%
Negative net income growth while 8420.HK stands at 31.50%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-59.60%
Negative EPS growth while 8420.HK is at 28.57%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-59.60%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 8420.HK is at 28.57%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.00%
Share change of 0.00% while 8420.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.15%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8420.HK stands at 18.31%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 8420.HK stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.51%
Positive short-term CAGR while 8420.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.21%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 8420.HK's 75.97%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-100.00%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-100.00%
We’re deleveraging while 8420.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.14%
We expand SG&A while 8420.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.