PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.69%
Revenue growth under 50% of 8420.HK's 22.31%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
60.56%
Positive gross profit growth while 8420.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
113.41%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 8420.HK's 36.84%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
113.93%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 8420.HK's 71.35%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
107.76%
Positive net income growth while 8420.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
110.13%
Positive EPS growth while 8420.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
110.13%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 8420.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 8420.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.40%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8420.HK stands at 224.85%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 8420.HK stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.04%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8420.HK is 38.28%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.30%
Positive short-term equity growth while 8420.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.41%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.