PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.08%
Negative revenue growth while 8420.HK stands at 36.85%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-43.19%
Negative gross profit growth while 8420.HK is at 39.76%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-407.38%
Negative EBIT growth while 8420.HK is at 12.98%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-367.29%
Negative operating income growth while 8420.HK is at 11.85%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-370.83%
Negative net income growth while 8420.HK stands at 9.69%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-363.72%
Negative EPS growth while 8420.HK is at 12.50%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-359.29%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 8420.HK is at 12.50%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.00%
Share change of 1.00% while 8420.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
2.00%
Diluted share change of 2.00% while 8420.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.23%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-643.58%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.14%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
103.80%
SG&A growth well above 8420.HK's 4.89%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.