PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.56%
Revenue growth under 50% of 8420.HK's 362.14%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
84.46%
Positive gross profit growth while 8420.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
3.22%
Positive EBIT growth while 8420.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
8.20%
Positive operating income growth while 8420.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-2.44%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-3.16%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-1.27%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.64%
Share reduction while 8420.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.97%
Diluted share change of 0.97% while 8420.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.99%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 8420.HK stands at 224.85%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-19.87%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8420.HK stands at 307.14%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.83%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 8420.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-89.81%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-178.48%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 8420.HK is 85.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-122.53%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8420.HK is 37.27%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.13%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 8420.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-27.61%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.81%
We cut SG&A while 8420.HK invests at 5.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.