PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.95%
Positive revenue growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
9.74%
Positive gross profit growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
28.23%
EBIT growth similar to 8480.HK's 30.28%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
129.01%
Positive operating income growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
19.66%
Net income growth under 50% of 8480.HK's 75.11%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-10.36%
Negative EPS growth while 8480.HK is at 96.30%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-10.36%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 8480.HK is at 96.30%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
33.33%
Slight or no buybacks while 8480.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
33.33%
Slight or no buyback while 8480.HK is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.74%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.