PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.46%
Revenue growth similar to 8480.HK's 5.91%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
-21.93%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-70.78%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-280.20%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
72.25%
Positive net income growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
71.74%
Positive EPS growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
71.74%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 8480.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.89%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8480.HK stands at 17.72%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 8480.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.44%
Positive short-term CAGR while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.26%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.69%
We cut SG&A while 8480.HK invests at 18.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.