PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.08%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-43.19%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-407.38%
Negative EBIT growth while 8480.HK is at 37.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-367.29%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-370.83%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-363.72%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-359.29%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
1.00%
Share change of 1.00% while 8480.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
2.00%
Diluted share change of 2.00% while 8480.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.23%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8480.HK stands at 25.56%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 8480.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-643.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8480.HK is 1670.74%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.14%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 8480.HK is at 18.53%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
103.80%
We expand SG&A while 8480.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.