PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.08%
Positive revenue growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
63.81%
Positive gross profit growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
61.14%
Positive EBIT growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
56.69%
Positive operating income growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
60.45%
Positive net income growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
66.98%
Positive EPS growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
66.67%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
19.79%
Share change of 19.79% while 8480.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
18.62%
Diluted share change of 18.62% while 8480.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.88%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-27.37%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-213.24%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-431.40%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8480.HK is 1023.15%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.34%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.