PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-17.31%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
77.20%
Positive gross profit growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
55.43%
Positive EBIT growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
55.43%
Positive operating income growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
51.35%
Positive net income growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
80.02%
Positive EPS growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
80.02%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
143.82%
Share count expansion well above 8480.HK's 4.76%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
143.82%
Diluted share count expanding well above 8480.HK's 4.76%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Positive OCF growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
100.00%
Positive FCF growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-73.60%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 8480.HK stands at 140.71%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-70.46%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8480.HK stands at 120.15%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 8480.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-303.91%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 8480.HK is 1231.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-1.50%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8480.HK is 29.63%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.48%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 8480.HK is at 7.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-74.87%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-100.00%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-100.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
535.86%
We expand SG&A while 8480.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.