PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-13.23%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-57.09%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
87.32%
Positive EBIT growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
85.80%
Positive operating income growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
88.51%
Positive net income growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
88.57%
Positive EPS growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
88.57%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.15%
Share reduction while 8480.HK is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.20%
Reduced diluted shares while 8480.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-78.36%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 8480.HK stands at 51.35%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-76.97%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-111.16%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 8480.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.08%
Below 50% of 8480.HK's 246.97%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
81.96%
Positive short-term CAGR while 8480.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-85.14%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 8480.HK is at 21.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-83.80%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 8480.HK is at 38.92%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.63%
AR growth well above 8480.HK's 10.92%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-51.21%
Inventory is declining while 8480.HK stands at 5.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-3.50%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-3.12%
We have a declining book value while 8480.HK shows 3.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-84.90%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-81.05%
We cut SG&A while 8480.HK invests at 10.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.