PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.56%
Revenue growth 75-90% of Trucking median of 1.84%. John Neff would look for catalysts to surpass sector growth.
84.46%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Trucking median of 3.46%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
3.22%
EBIT growth below 50% of Trucking median of 6.65%. Jim Chanos would suspect fundamental operating challenges.
8.20%
Operating income growth 50-75% of Trucking median of 12.29%. Guy Spier would question management’s efficiency measures.
-2.44%
Negative net income growth while Trucking median is 8.52%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-3.16%
Negative EPS growth while Trucking median is 10.05%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-1.27%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Trucking median is 10.05%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.64%
Share reduction while Trucking median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
0.97%
Diluted share change of 0.97% while Trucking median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.99%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Trucking median is 50.56%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-19.87%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Trucking median is 37.75%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.83%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Trucking median is 8.90%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-89.81%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Trucking median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-178.48%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Trucking median is 125.38%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-122.53%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Trucking median is 58.35%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.13%
Below 50% of Trucking median. Jim Chanos suspects weak profitability or questionable capital allocation limiting equity growth.
-27.61%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Trucking median is 12.21%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.81%
SG&A decline while Trucking grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.