C&N Holdings Limited (8430.HK)

0.140.01 (10.66%)

C&N Holdings Limited (8430.HK) stock comprehensive Forecast and Price Target with Analyst Ratings, Revenue Estimates, and complete financial and advanced discounted cashflow forecasts for up to 10 years.

Low Bankruptcy RiskLow ProfitabilityModerate EfficiencyModerate GrowthModerate QualityAdequate Dividend ProfileIndustry Rank: 64.52%Sector Rank: 65.40%

HKSE - Industrials - Trucking | Market Cap: 22.52M | Next Earnings Date: 31 Mar 2025

Day's Range

0.14 - 0.14

52-Week Range

0.08 - 0.20

Volume

5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)

P/E Ratio | EPS

-6.75 | -0.02

Trending:

Analyst Consensus

Compare with Competitor

None

View analysts' price targets and recommendations, and compare them with competitors.

Analyst Price Target

No Data

No price target data available for this metric.

Analyst Recommendation

Neutral consensus among analysts.

Financial Forecasts

Analyze analyst forecasts for the company and compare them with competitors.

No Data Available

No financial forecast data is currently available for 8430.HK. This could be because the stock is not widely covered by analysts or the data is temporarily unavailable.

Discounted Cash Flow Forecasts for 2026

Select Year

2029 2028 2027 2026 2025 2024

Compare with Competitor

None 8402.HK 8420.HK 8480.HK

Analyze DCF forecasts for the company and compare them with competitors.

Revenue

156.31M

Higher than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's revenue of 153.69M.

Revenue Growth Rate

-0.17%

Higher than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's revenue growth rate of -9.32%.

EBITDA

-7.48M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's ebitda of 13.80M.

EBITDA Margin

-4.78%

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's ebitda margin of 8.98%.

EBIT

-23.68M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's ebit of 6.75M.

EBIT Margin

-15.15%

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's ebit margin of 4.39%.

Depreciation

16.21M

Higher than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's depreciation of 7.05M.

Total Cash

32.20M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's total cash of 121.72M.

Cash as Percentage of Revenue

20.60%

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's cash as percentage of revenue of 79.19%.

Receivables

32.48M

Higher than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's receivables of 21.81M.

Receivables as Percentage of Revenue

20.78%

Higher than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's receivables as percentage of revenue of 14.19%.

Inventories

1.11M

Lower than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's inventories of 3.56M.

Inventories as Percentage of Revenue

0.71%

Lower than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's inventories as percentage of revenue of 2.32%.

Accounts Payable

6.58M

Lower than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's accounts payable of 6.78M.

Payables as Percentage of Revenue

4.21%

Lower than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's payables as percentage of revenue of 4.41%.

Capital Expenditure

-6.06M

Lower than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's capital expenditure of -2.85M.

CapEx as Percentage of Revenue

-3.87%

Lower than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's capex as percentage of revenue of -1.85%.

Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)

4.58%

Lower than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's weighted average cost of capital (wacc) of 4.87%.

Cost of Equity

4.87%

Lower than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's cost of equity of 4.98%.

Cost of Debt

3.93%

Lower than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's cost of debt of 4.04%.

Beta

0.03

Lower than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's beta of 0.20.

Diluted Shares Outstanding

166.84M

Lower than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's diluted shares outstanding of 400.00M.

Total Debt

6.54M

Lower than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's total debt of 9.56M.

Total Equity

19.85M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's total equity of 91.60M.

Total Capital

26.39M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's total capital of 101.17M.

Debt Weighting

24.78%

Higher than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's debt weighting of 9.45%.

Equity Weighting

75.22%

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's equity weighting of 90.55%.

EBIAT

-22.11M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's ebiat of 6.25M.

Unlevered Free Cash Flow

-11.92M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's unlevered free cash flow of 12.37M.

Long-Term Growth Rate

2.00%

Higher than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's long-term growth rate of 0.50%.

Terminal Value

-469.48M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's terminal value of 212.29M.

Enterprise Value

-413.40M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's enterprise value of 206.05M.

Net Debt

2.75M

Higher than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's net debt of -165.57M.

Equity Value

-416.15M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's equity value of 371.62M.

Equity Value Per Share

-2.49

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's equity value per share of 0.93.

Select Metric for Chart

Discounted Cash Flow Forecasts for 2026

Select Year

2029 2028 2027 2026 2025 2024

Compare with Competitor

None 8402.HK 8420.HK 8480.HK

Analyze DCF forecasts for the company and compare them with competitors.

Revenue

156.31M

Higher than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's revenue of 153.69M.

Revenue Growth Rate

-0.17%

Higher than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's revenue growth rate of -9.32%.

EBITDA

-7.48M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's ebitda of 13.80M.

EBITDA Margin

-4.78%

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's ebitda margin of 8.98%.

EBIT

-23.68M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's ebit of 6.75M.

EBIT Margin

-15.15%

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's ebit margin of 4.39%.

Depreciation

16.21M

Higher than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's depreciation of 7.05M.

Total Cash

32.20M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's total cash of 121.72M.

Cash as Percentage of Revenue

20.60%

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's cash as percentage of revenue of 79.19%.

Receivables

32.48M

Higher than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's receivables of 21.81M.

Receivables as Percentage of Revenue

20.78%

Higher than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's receivables as percentage of revenue of 14.19%.

Inventories

1.11M

Lower than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's inventories of 3.56M.

Inventories as Percentage of Revenue

0.71%

Lower than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's inventories as percentage of revenue of 2.32%.

Accounts Payable

6.58M

Lower than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's accounts payable of 6.78M.

Payables as Percentage of Revenue

4.21%

Lower than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's payables as percentage of revenue of 4.41%.

Capital Expenditure

-6.06M

Lower than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's capital expenditure of -2.85M.

CapEx as Percentage of Revenue

-3.87%

Lower than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's capex as percentage of revenue of -1.85%.

Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)

4.58%

Lower than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's weighted average cost of capital (wacc) of 4.87%.

Cost of Equity

4.87%

Lower than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's cost of equity of 4.98%.

Cost of Debt

3.93%

Lower than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's cost of debt of 4.04%.

Beta

0.03

Lower than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's beta of 0.20.

Diluted Shares Outstanding

166.84M

Lower than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's diluted shares outstanding of 400.00M.

Total Debt

6.54M

Lower than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's total debt of 9.56M.

Total Equity

19.85M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's total equity of 91.60M.

Total Capital

26.39M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's total capital of 101.17M.

Debt Weighting

24.78%

Higher than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's debt weighting of 9.45%.

Equity Weighting

75.22%

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's equity weighting of 90.55%.

EBIAT

-22.11M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's ebiat of 6.25M.

Unlevered Free Cash Flow

-11.92M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's unlevered free cash flow of 12.37M.

Long-Term Growth Rate

2.00%

Higher than competitor

Better than 8436.HK's long-term growth rate of 0.50%.

Terminal Value

-469.48M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's terminal value of 212.29M.

Enterprise Value

-413.40M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's enterprise value of 206.05M.

Net Debt

2.75M

Higher than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's net debt of -165.57M.

Equity Value

-416.15M

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's equity value of 371.62M.

Equity Value Per Share

-2.49

Lower than competitor

Worse than 8436.HK's equity value per share of 0.93.

Select Metric for Chart