PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-14.94%
Revenue decline while 8402.HK shows 229.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
8.29%
Cost growth less than half of 8402.HK's 242.89%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-68.03%
Gross profit decline while 8402.HK shows 193.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-62.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
226.78%
G&A growth 50-75% of 8402.HK's 396.31%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
55.59%
Other expenses growth less than half of 8402.HK's 2027.48%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
244.73%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of 8402.HK's 373.06%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
36.38%
Total costs growth less than half of 8402.HK's 272.08%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-49.13%
Interest expense reduction while 8402.HK shows 65.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
225.30%
D&A growth less than half of 8402.HK's 2027.48%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-205.37%
EBITDA decline while 8402.HK shows 1762.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-223.87%
EBITDA margin decline while 8402.HK shows 464.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-205.68%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-224.24%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
103.06%
Other expenses growth while 8402.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-209.57%
Pre-tax income decline while 8402.HK shows 2304.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-228.81%
Pre-tax margin decline while 8402.HK shows 629.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-104.10%
Tax expense reduction while 8402.HK shows 970.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-233.24%
Net income decline while 8402.HK shows 4458.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-256.63%
Net margin decline while 8402.HK shows 1282.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-233.33%
EPS decline while 8402.HK shows 2800.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-233.33%
Diluted EPS decline while 8402.HK shows 2800.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.