PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.63%
Revenue growth below 50% of 8402.HK's 74.82%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-0.04%
Cost reduction while 8402.HK shows 79.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
4.11%
Gross profit growth below 50% of 8402.HK's 62.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.45%
Margin expansion while 8402.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.01%
G&A growth less than half of 8402.HK's 299.48%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while 8402.HK shows 6.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
30.48%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 8402.HK's 261.29%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
3.42%
Total costs growth less than half of 8402.HK's 94.48%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-12.70%
Interest expense reduction while 8402.HK shows 91.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-94.31%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-66.95%
EBITDA decline while 8402.HK shows 3.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-67.15%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
230.21%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x 8402.HK's 16.29%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
229.39%
Operating margin growth while 8402.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.79%
Other expenses growth while 8402.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-37.20%
Pre-tax income decline while 8402.HK shows 8.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-37.60%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
29.89%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x 8402.HK's 12.54%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-45.84%
Net income decline while 8402.HK shows 8.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-46.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.52%
EPS decline while 8402.HK shows 8.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-50.52%
Diluted EPS decline while 8402.HK shows 8.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.