PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.32%
Positive growth while 8402.HK shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.13%
Cost increase while 8402.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-1.64%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.72%
G&A growth while 8402.HK reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.70%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
6.86%
Total costs growth while 8402.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-13.89%
Interest expense reduction while 8402.HK shows 4.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-118.19%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-18.55%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
22.51%
Operating income growth while 8402.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.15%
Operating margin growth while 8402.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-302.60%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-49.75%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-53.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.59%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-62.16%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-64.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-66.67%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-66.67%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.