PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.90%
Revenue decline while 8402.HK shows 28.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
1.24%
Cost growth less than half of 8402.HK's 15.18%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-25.68%
Gross profit decline while 8402.HK shows 107.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-23.45%
Margin decline while 8402.HK shows 61.57% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.45%
G&A growth less than half of 8402.HK's 164.39%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while 8402.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
36.13%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 8402.HK's 132.60%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.60%
Total costs growth less than half of 8402.HK's 18.71%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-9.55%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
9758.02%
D&A growth above 1.5x 8402.HK's 1904.99%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-32.10%
EBITDA decline while 8402.HK shows 111.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.07%
EBITDA margin decline while 8402.HK shows 65.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-498.36%
Operating income decline while 8402.HK shows 72.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-510.27%
Operating margin decline while 8402.HK shows 34.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
75.18%
Other expenses growth less than half of 8402.HK's 1144.17%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-365.67%
Pre-tax income decline while 8402.HK shows 95.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-373.61%
Pre-tax margin decline while 8402.HK shows 52.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-91.01%
Tax expense reduction while 8402.HK shows 44.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-568.36%
Net income decline while 8402.HK shows 114.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-582.37%
Net margin decline while 8402.HK shows 67.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-681.25%
EPS decline while 8402.HK shows 113.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-681.25%
Diluted EPS decline while 8402.HK shows 113.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.