PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-12.08%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-9.78%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-43.19%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-35.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
103.80%
G&A growth above 1.5x 8402.HK's 15.40%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.72%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x 8402.HK's 1.93%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
153.38%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x 8402.HK's 18.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
10.45%
Total costs growth while 8402.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-31.11%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
16.85%
D&A growth while 8402.HK reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-337.39%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-397.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-367.29%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-431.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9733.23%
Other expenses growth while 8402.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-370.83%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-435.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
55.07%
Tax expense growth while 8402.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-370.83%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-435.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-363.72%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-359.29%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.00%
Share count change of 1.00% while 8402.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
2.00%
Diluted share change of 2.00% while 8402.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.