PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.18%
Revenue growth below 50% of 8402.HK's 242.77%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.37%
Cost growth less than half of 8402.HK's 72.88%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-7.57%
Gross profit decline while 8402.HK shows 97.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-9.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
153.26%
G&A growth while 8402.HK reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
269.41%
Other expenses growth while 8402.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
174.54%
Operating expenses growth while 8402.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.68%
Total costs growth 50-75% of 8402.HK's 28.21%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-65.02%
Interest expense reduction while 8402.HK shows 289.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-656.37%
EBITDA decline while 8402.HK shows 85.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-640.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-212.57%
Operating income decline while 8402.HK shows 82.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-205.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
442.41%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x 8402.HK's 109.12%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-176.58%
Pre-tax income decline while 8402.HK shows 82.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-170.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
67.78%
Tax expense growth while 8402.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-603.32%
Net income decline while 8402.HK shows 82.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-588.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-496.23%
EPS decline while 8402.HK shows 82.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-507.69%
Diluted EPS decline while 8402.HK shows 82.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.52%
Share count change of 17.52% while 8402.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
15.11%
Diluted share change of 15.11% while 8402.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.