PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-12.08%
Revenue decline while 8420.HK shows 36.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.78%
Cost reduction while 8420.HK shows 27.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-43.19%
Gross profit decline while 8420.HK shows 39.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-35.39%
Margin decline while 8420.HK shows 2.13% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
103.80%
G&A growth above 1.5x 8420.HK's 9.14%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.72%
Other expenses growth less than half of 8420.HK's 1900.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
153.38%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x 8420.HK's 6.73%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
10.45%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x 8420.HK's 8.91%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
-31.11%
Interest expense reduction while 8420.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
16.85%
D&A growth while 8420.HK reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-337.39%
EBITDA decline while 8420.HK shows 18.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-397.47%
EBITDA margin decline while 8420.HK shows 40.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-367.29%
Operating income decline while 8420.HK shows 11.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-431.48%
Operating margin decline while 8420.HK shows 35.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9733.23%
Other expenses growth while 8420.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-370.83%
Pre-tax income decline while 8420.HK shows 12.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-435.51%
Pre-tax margin decline while 8420.HK shows 36.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
55.07%
Tax expense growth less than half of 8420.HK's 123.81%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-370.83%
Net income decline while 8420.HK shows 9.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-435.51%
Net margin decline while 8420.HK shows 34.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-363.72%
EPS decline while 8420.HK shows 12.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-359.29%
Diluted EPS decline while 8420.HK shows 12.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.00%
Share count change of 1.00% while 8420.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
2.00%
Diluted share change of 2.00% while 8420.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.